技术合伙人的股权设计是平衡技术价值与公司发展的关键，既需认可技术对企业的核心贡献，又要通过机制保障股权与责任的长期绑定，避免因股权分配不当引发团队矛盾或发展隐患。

　　The equity design of technology partners is the key to balancing the value of technology and the development of the company. It not only recognizes the core contribution of technology to the enterprise, but also ensures the long-term binding of equity and responsibility through mechanisms to avoid team conflicts or development risks caused by improper equity distribution.

　　股权比例的确定需锚定技术的核心性。核心技术（如独家专利、不可替代的算法体系）可占 15%-30% 股权，这类技术直接决定企业的护城河，如某 AI 公司的核心算法合伙人因技术独占性获得 25% 股权；非核心技术（如通用技术开发、现有技术优化）则适合 10%-20%，其价值更多体现在执行层面。同时需结合创始人团队的整体贡献，若创始人已投入大量资金与资源，技术合伙人股权需相应调整，避免 “技术独大” 导致决策失衡，通常创始人与技术合伙人的股权总和建议不低于 51%，保障公司控制权稳定。

　　The determination of equity ratio requires anchoring the core technology. Core technologies (such as exclusive patents and irreplaceable algorithm systems) can hold 15% -30% equity, which directly determines the moat of the enterprise. For example, the core algorithm partner of an AI company obtains 25% equity due to technological exclusivity; Non core technologies (such as general technology development and existing technology optimization) are suitable for 10% -20%, and their value is more reflected in the execution level. At the same time, it is necessary to consider the overall contribution of the founder's team. If the founder has invested a large amount of funds and resources, the equity of the technology partner needs to be adjusted accordingly to avoid decision-making imbalance caused by "technology dominance". Generally, the total equity of the founder and technology partner is recommended to be no less than 51% to ensure stable control of the company.

　　分期兑现机制防范短期退出风险。股权授予不应一次性到位，而需与服务期限、业绩里程碑绑定：常见的 4 年分期兑现（每年兑现 25%），首年兑现部分可设置 1 年 “cliffs 期”（满 1 年才兑现首笔 25%），防止合伙人短期离开带走大量股权。或采用 “里程碑 + 时间” 双重标准，如产品原型落地兑现 30%、正式上线兑现 30%、用户量达标兑现 40%，让股权获取与技术成果的实际落地挂钩。某硬件公司规定，技术合伙人需在 2 年内完成核心芯片研发，否则已兑现股权的 20% 将被回购，通过动态调整确保股权与贡献匹配。

　　The installment redemption mechanism prevents short-term exit risks. Equity grants should not be granted in a lump sum, but should be tied to service periods and performance milestones: the common 4-year installment redemption (25% redeemed annually), with a 1-year "clips period" set for the first year redemption (the first 25% redeemed after 1 year) to prevent partners from taking away a large amount of equity in the short term. Alternatively, a dual standard of "milestone+time" can be adopted, such as 30% redemption for product prototype landing, 30% redemption for official launch, and 40% redemption for meeting user volume standards, linking equity acquisition with the actual landing of technological achievements. A certain hardware company stipulates that technical partners must complete core chip research and development within 2 years, otherwise 20% of the redeemed equity will be repurchased, and dynamic adjustments will be made to ensure that the equity matches the contribution.

　　退出机制需明确股权收回规则。主动退出时，未兑现的股权应全部收回，已兑现部分按 “退出时公司估值的 80%-100%” 由公司或其他股东回购（具体比例根据服务年限调整，满 3 年可按 100% 回购），避免 “躺平股东” 长期分利。被动退出（如违反竞业协议、泄露核心技术）则需设定惩罚性条款，已兑现股权可按 “原值或极低价格” 回购，甚至清零，某软件公司因技术合伙人离职后加入竞品，通过协议收回其全部已兑现股权，保障公司技术安全。对于技术迭代导致的 “价值衰减”（如原技术被新方案替代），可约定股权随技术权重降低而逐步稀释（每年不超过 5%），平衡新旧技术的价值变化。

　　The exit mechanism needs to clarify the rules for equity recovery. When voluntarily withdrawing, all unrealized equity should be recovered, and the cashed portion should be repurchased by the company or other shareholders at a rate of "80% -100% of the company's valuation at the time of withdrawal" (the specific ratio is adjusted according to the service life, and can be repurchased at 100% after 3 years), to avoid long-term profit sharing among "lying flat shareholders". Passive withdrawal (such as violating non compete agreements or leaking core technologies) requires punitive clauses. The redeemed equity can be repurchased at "original value or extremely low price", or even cleared. A software company joined the competition after the departure of its technical partner, and all its redeemed equity can be recovered through an agreement to ensure the company's technical security. For the "value decay" caused by technological iteration (such as the replacement of original technology by new solutions), it can be agreed that equity will gradually dilute with the decrease of technology weight (not exceeding 5% per year), balancing the value changes of new and old technologies.

　　价值评估需多维量化技术贡献。除技术本身的稀缺性（如是否为行业卡脖子技术），还需评估：研发阶段（已成型技术比在研技术溢价 30%-50%）、对营收的直接影响（如技术落地后可降低 30% 成本，或提升 50% 效率）、可替代性（独家掌握 vs. 团队可复制）。某新能源企业评估技术合伙人时，不仅考虑其专利价值，还测算该技术能为公司带来的 3 年预期营收增量，最终按 “技术估值 + 预期贡献” 确定股权比例，避免主观定价引发争议。

　　Value assessment requires multidimensional quantification of technical contributions. In addition to the scarcity of the technology itself (such as whether it is a bottleneck technology in the industry), it is also necessary to evaluate: the research and development stage (where the already formed technology is 30% -50% more expensive than the technology under development), the direct impact on revenue (such as reducing costs by 30% or improving efficiency by 50% after the technology is implemented), and substitutability (exclusive control vs. team replicability). When evaluating the technology partners of a new energy enterprise, not only is the patent value considered, but also the expected 3-year revenue increase that the technology can bring to the company is calculated. Finally, the equity ratio is determined based on "technology valuation+expected contribution" to avoid disputes caused by subjective pricing.

　　本文由济南股权设计友情奉献.更多有关的知识请点击:http://www.daoshangbao.com真诚的态度.为您提供为全面的服务.更多有关的知识我们将会陆续向大家奉献.敬请期待.

　　This article is about Shandong Equity Incentive Friendship Dedication For more information, please click: http://www.daoshangbao.com Sincere attitude To provide you with comprehensive services We will gradually contribute more relevant knowledge to everyone Coming soon.